fbpx Skip to content

Language Development and “Technoference”

Language Development and “Technoference”

A recent longitudinal study conducted in Australia, led by senior research officer Mary Brushe and published in the Journal of the American Medical Association Pediatrics, revealed concerning findings: excessive screen time could potentially deprive the average three-year-old of exposure to 1,100 adult words, 840 vocalizations, and 194 conversations each day. As an educator deeply committed to children’s development, this statistic raised serious alarms for me. The study highlighted the concept of “technoference,” where technology-based disruptions, such as prolonged screen usage, could hinder meaningful communication and interaction between parents and children, leading to a significant reduction in daily word exposure for three-year-olds.

This translates to three-year-olds hearing seven fewer adult words and speaking five fewer words themselves for every minute spent on screens. Typically, children encounter between 5,000 and 35,000 words daily, but with technoference, this exposure is significantly reduced. The implications are profound, as vocabulary plays a crucial role in reading comprehension, as indicated by research (Suggate et al., 2018). Suggate asserts that individual words in a text, along with background knowledge, are strong predictors of comprehension, contributing to the Matthew Effect, wherein initial advantages lead to further benefits (Smith et al., 2021).

Research consistently underscores the vital importance of language-rich environments during childhood for linguistic development, echoing the insights of Dr. Montessori and scientific consensus on “sensitive periods” and “windows of opportunity” for language acquisition. Although the critical period for language development may extend beyond the earlier years, the brain’s neuroplasticity is most pronounced in the first decade of life (DiCresce, 1997), akin to the pruning process where underutilized synapses diminish over time.

As an educator, my concern extends beyond vocabulary and comprehension to the reciprocal relationship between background knowledge and comprehension. Recent studies emphasize that students with robust background knowledge comprehend texts more effectively, thereby enriching their knowledge base further. In essence, a low-skilled reader can grasp a text well if it aligns with their familiar subjects.

Therefore, I advocate for adhering to World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines to limit screen time and encourage parents to engage in meaningful conversations with their children, fostering a language-filled social environment conducive to optimal development.

blank

About the Author

Recent Posts